Performance Anxiety
photo collage
I
was in a broker’s office recently talking business and staring at walls so bare
and so… beige that I thought I was in Nowhere Land. There were a couple of badly framed
things on the walls, diplomas or permits or something, and they conveyed not a
feeling of accomplishment and qualification, but one of compliance and
indifference. When I had to wait for papers to be gotten or computers to be consulted,
I sat staring at the walls and wondered at their blankness.
This
person is one of those who handle my money. Money, after all, relates to
Culture, and in my life, Art plays the major role in allowing me to earn it.
Also, at the very least I’d expect to see some sign of creativity, of
imagination and flexibility in this place where someone is entrusted with
investing money for me. To see
absolutely none was… distressing.
I
knew this has been this person’s office for years; it struck me as strange. I
finally had to say something. I asked, “Have you thought about putting
paintings up?”
The
answer startled me. “Oh, we’re into sports,” she said.
I
said, “Oh, great, so am I. But what about art?”
“We
go skiing, play tennis, you know, we’re busy,” was the response, as if that
explained everything.
“Well
then, how about putting up photographs of that?’ I asked encouragingly.
“Photographs?”
the broker asked as if confounded.
Changing
tack, I asked, “Don’t your children make art projects at school? Maybe those?
You can get nice frames everywhere now,” I suggested. Because she handles
money, I added, “Cheap.”
A
frown appeared on the broker’s face. “Children? In an office? Anyway, my daughter has so many sports
activities…” then her face brightened. “She’s learning to play a musical
instrument actually. The school psychologist suggested it because she was...
difficult. We had to force her to take lessons but she’s really serious about practicing
now,” she said. “I think she’ll come to like it.”
I
smiled, encouraged. “Sports, music, that’s very good. What about art?”
After
a moment she said, “My daughter loves to draw. She’s always doodling, even when
she talks on the phone.”
At
last! “Exactly!” said I.
“She
wanted what she calls ‘real’ lessons but since she loves it, she doesn’t really
need them. Anyway, her schoolteacher says she has natural talent,” was the
response.
“Really?”
I said. Oh my gosh, I thought. How to do this gently? I said, “You love dealing
with money, don’t you?”
“Always
have,” she agreed.
I
pointed to one of the diplomas on the wall, “But you got a degree.”
“Of course,” she answered as if
insulted. Then she turned pink, “Oh. I see. But she’s so busy already!”
“How
many sports does she need? Maybe she’d be happy to replace one for art
lessons?” I suggested.
“Replace
sports?” she said as if I’d suggested something distasteful. “ She’s on teams!
We love to ski! We love hockey! We love soccer and tennis!”
“Yes,
but does your daughter?” I asked. “Does she more than drawing?”
“It’s
just drawing,” the broker said defensively.
Just
drawing. Just art? Them’s fighting words. On the child’s behalf, I put forth my
take on things.
People
seem to take the absence of visual art from their lives in stride. It’s ‘just
art’, after all, nothing to miss, right? Everyone is naturally creative, right?
It seems a majority of people I speak to who find out I am an artist tell me
they COULD have been artists, they were that talented as children. Their eyes
gaze wistfully into space and there follows a description of their talent, or
of the amazing piece they made in grade four, or five… but then, they blink and
tell me a teacher intimidated them or a critique crushed their confidence, or
they didn’t get a prize, or a parent pointed out the eventual life of misery
and starvation, or it took too much effort to learn the techniques...
It’s
ok, it’s not important they continue, and proceed to tell me they dream of
going back to their art when they retire to make extra money. That’s ironic,
because, when asked why they don’t take courses just to keep it up, they
insist, “Oh, I have no talent.” And when they’re asked why they don’t go to
galleries or museums, or why they don’t buy other people’s art, if they’re
honest they say, “I don’t get it.” If they’re not honest they say, “It’s all
crap today!”
They
seem to sweep all of the visual arts into the “maybe when I retire” box, but
then accuse the art they see by others of being undecipherable even though they
are the ones who have not kept up with it.
Pity.
Pity because this abandonment means that too many people become adults who are
visually illiterate. They can read, they can write, they can count (maybe), but
can they see beyond what they are shown? They become compliant consumers,
unable to imagine alternatives to what manufacturers choose to mass produce;
they accept the loss of culture in their education in the name of
‘employability’; they become aggressively competitive rather than developing a
good-natured complicity in their sports; they are unable to see that some
things don’t fit their lives or personalities, no matter how many other people
have them. They also come to view difference as threatening and to try to
eliminate it rather than being curious about it or even tolerant of it.
Art
(and therefore culture) becomes a language they cannot understand beyond the
limited vocabulary of elementary or high school. Their opinion of it becomes
closed, arrogant, even dogmatic, If and when they return to art making in
retirement, they find they can only pick up where they left off as children, if
they remember it; if they don’t learn to hate it. They come to being blind to
the fact that blank walls surround them.
“If
you put it that way,” said the broker once I was done.
I found out that since
our conversation last year, her daughter has been happily taking at classes, and the
girl’s drawings and paintings are now framed and hanging in their living room.
Art images apparently now adorn the broker’s office beside pictures of athletes, communicating
both thoughtfulness and achievement.
I am delighted. There is hope!
No comments:
Post a Comment